07 Jun '11, 5pm

Is the loss of 2007 and 2011 CBECS surveys significant? Weigh in here:

Posted by Jerry Yudelson on Jun 5, 2011, 04:08 PM Come on, folks, get real. Federal budget cuts are just beginning. Why not hit DOE a little harder for CHOOSING to prioritize other spending over this? Any organization that can give away $500 million for electric cars can come up with a few million for building energy surveys, which address much greater energy demands. While you're at it, why not investigate why the 2007 survey was undertaken in a statistically feeble way, such that the data are now unusable?

Full article: http://www.buildinggreen.com/auth/article.cfm/2011/5/3/Ke...

Tweets

DOE Offers Cheap Patents for Energy Startups

DOE Offers Cheap Patents for Energy Startups

buildinggreen.com 07 Jun '11, 8pm

Newsbrief from Environmental Building News DOE Offers Cheap Patents for Energy Startups By Paula Melton Steven Chu, the U....

Ice Loss in the #Canadian #Arctic Archipelago (NASA EO) #ocean #climate

Ice Loss in the #Canadian #Arctic Archipelago (...

earthobservatory.nasa.gov 04 Jun '11, 6pm

Though much attention has been focused in recent years on the melting of ice from Greenland and Antarctica, nearly half of...

VTT study finds no significant difference in car fuel consumption between E10 and E5

VTT study finds no significant difference in ca...

greencarcongress.com 06 Jun '11, 2pm

VTT study finds no significant difference in car fuel consumption between E10 and E5 6 June 2011 A study conducted by VTT ...